Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Shakespeare Behind Bars: A Worthwhile Way to Spend Time in Prison
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Creative Engagement Week 12: MacHomer - An Additional Adaption of Shakespeare Not Mentioned in the Prologue
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
A Modern Day Volpone
Friday, April 29, 2011
Different Representations of Utopia: Creative Engagement Week 10

Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Utopia as a Satire: Was Sir Thomas More Mocking Us All?
When I first began reading Utopia for this week’s readings, I went in with the intent to do a first pass reading of the introduction, More’s letter, and Book 1. But as I was doing my first pass on More’s letter to Peter Giles, I became really interested in what he was really trying to say. He begins to describe to Peter that they have overlooked the fact that they do not know “in what area of the New World Utopia is to be found” (523). He talks to his friend as if someone wants to know where Utopia is actually located. He says he is “ashamed not to know even the name of the ocean where this island lies about which I’ve written so much” (523). At first I read this as if he really was concerned, but the more I thought about it, I took it as More being sarcastic to anyone who might actually believe this place exists (or could ever exist).
With this idea in mind, it affected me as I continued to read. I began to wonder if this idea seemed impossible and unattainable to More and that he may have been simply showing and teasing us with something that we will never have. It is almost as if he could be mocking us with the idea of a better society and structure. He presents this amazing concept, but in reality, it is highly unattainable.
If I think about it in this way, I begin to compare More with Satan in the form of the serpent in the Bible. The serpent lures Eve to something that he describes as perfect and makes her long for something she should not touch. In this sense, More is like the serpent because he describes to us something so perfect and something that everyone would long for. Who wouldn’t want to live in the most perfect society? Did More have this intent while writing Utopia (even if it was an underlining motive)?
To extend off this comparison even more, let’s say we somehow achieved this society, would it be as perfect as we once believed? Adam and Eve were faced with so many hardships after taking what they had longed for. Would we experience those same hardships? Would we get more than we bargained for with form of society? As humans, we are inherently competitive. Could we just send people out to the country to help with harvesting? Would people view undeveloped and free land as something that should not be built on or owned?
I think if this Utopia were to ever even come close to existence, we could come across more problems than you would think. Do you think More knew this the whole time and he meant to just throw something out there to tease us with? Or was he really trying to make a difference in society?
Friday, April 15, 2011
A Letter to a Younger Me: A Warning for UD's Teacher Job Fair
Dear Past Me, Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Elizabethans Are the Best! (Or At Least They Think So)
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Creative Engagement Week 4: Helpful Timeline I Stumbled Upon This Week
If Shakespeare’s Ideas Are Not Original, Whose Are?! -- Appreciating the Form of Sonnets
When I first read our Prologue for this week and the introduction to Shakespeare in our Norton’s Anthology, I was surprised to read that Shakespeare’s thoughts and themes were thought to be unoriginal. I just reread some of Vendler’s claims that are mentioned in the Prologue for week four. I decided to investigate these suggestions. As I was researching British literature, I stumbled upon a pretty helpful timeline, which I will post and explain above my rumination as my creative engagement for this week. The timeline gives a pretty good jist of the major concepts of the time period and also provides some staple examples by authors of the era.
So far in our course, we have “traveled” through the Old English/Anglo-Saxon Period in which there was an emphasis on fate, the success of heroic characters (as we saw in Beowulf), and expression of religious beliefs. To me, none of these concepts showed up as prominent themes in Shakespeare’s sonnets. The next stop on our travels was the Middle English Period. This is where I began to see Vendler’s point. When we read the works from the Middle English period, we saw themes revolving around love, which Shakespeare also focused on.
However, after I began writing this Rumination, I started to think of another quote by Vendler mentioned in the Prologue by Professor Calhoun. He pointed out Vendler’s quote that “The appeal of lyric lies elsewhere than in its paraphrasable statement” (14). I will admit that I had to reread this statement several times before I could make sense of it for myself. What I took away from this is that maybe what we should be appreciating about Shakespeare’s sonnets is the actual format of the sonnet and not necessarily the sonnet’s theme or message. Sonnets are definitely a difficult form of poetry to write. In the appendix of our anthology, a sonnet is defined as “a form combining a variable number of units of rhymed lines to produce a fourteen-line poem, usually in rhyming iambic pentameter lines” (A48). It also goes on to explain the Shakespearean sonnet as being “formed by three quatrains (abab cdcd efef) and a couplet (gg)” (A48). Talk about a mouth full! I was challenged by my high school honors English teacher to write my own sonnet, and let me tell you it was not easy. There are so many things to work with while trying to express an idea. You not only have to worry about conveying your ideas but you also have to think about the meter and the rhyme scheme of the sonnet. I now understand Vendler’s point that, yeah, maybe Shakespeare’s sonnets about love were not the most original themes or ideas but maybe that is not what we are supposed to worry about while analyzing the work. To me, Vendler was trying to tell us that the actual format of the sonnet is something that we should appreciate while reviewing the sonnets of Shakespeare instead of the theme or message of the sonnet.
As I started reading the sonnets from this week, my focus was more on the main idea of the sonnet. However, after I began this Rumination, I continued reading and rereading the sonnets focusing on the format of the sonnet versus the message. It really is impressive that Shakespeare was able to write this many sonnets while having to focus on the meter and rhyme scheme of each one. I definitely have a newfound respect for the sonnets of Shakespeare.
Friday, March 4, 2011
Lyrical Sequence: The Love Songs by A Fine Frenzy in "One Cell in the Sea"
When I first listened to our wildcard assignment for this week, many artists and albums came to mind. The album that choose to focus on is “One Cell in the Sea” by A Fine Frenzy (AFF). AFF is composed of only one female singer, Alison Sudol. Most of her songs focus on the lost of love and how it feels when it is gone. She also writes about relationships and the journey many can take only to end, similar to many of our readings for this week. Also similar to our readings this week, her songs give you a feeling as if she is singing to some in particular. AFF’s lyrics are very emotional and strong. Itunes describes Sudol’s lyrics as “dreamily evocative wordplay”. Although all her songs have sonnet-like lyrical sequences, I decided to discuss three of her more powerful and thought provoking songs, “Almost Lover,” “Ashes and Wine,” and “Last of Days”.
“Almost Lover” is the album’s most popular song. Sudol writes about the man who was “almost” her lover. She says goodbye to him in this slow tempo song. Sudol explains the reasons why she feel for this man and explains how is trying to deal with her loss. She puts the blame on her stating:
“I should've known you'd bring me heartache,
Almost lovers always do”.
The lyrics in this poem are similar to the sonnets we read this week because she examining why she had these feelings and explains how it feels when those feelings are no longer returned. The refrain is the most emotional part of the song and is repeated through the song:
“I never want to see you unhappy
I thought you'd want the same for me
Goodbye, my almost lover
Goodbye, my hopeless dream
I'm trying not to think about you
Can't you just let me be?
So long, my luckless romance
My back is turned on you
I should've known you'd bring me heartache,
Almost lovers always do”
The album continues with “Ashes and Wine” in which Sudol is also mourning the loss of a relationship. This time she is contemplating if there is anything she can do to bring the relationship back to life. There is a very hopeless feel to the song from the beginning when she states:
“Don't know what to do anymore
I've lost the only love worth fighting for”
She continues on to ask her lover if there is anything she can do to get them back in the refrain:
“Is there a chance?
A fragment of light at the end of the tunnel?
A reason to fight?
Is there a chance you may change your mind?
Or are we ashes and wine?”
This song is filled with emotion and desperation trying to get back her lover.
The last song I want to focus on from “One Cell in the Sea” is “Last of Days”. The lyrics of this song show Sudol’s feelings about how she is handling the loss of a love. She explains that:
“The world carries on without you
But nothing remains the same
I'll be lost without you
Until the last of days
Until the last of days”
Not only did this song remind me of the readings from this week, but it also reminded me of the readings from last week, specifically The Wife’s Lament, in which the wife describes how her life cannot on the same without her husband.
Overall, many of AFF’s songs have sonnet like lyrics and themes within them. If you have not ever listened to AFF and you enjoy female vocalists, I highly suggest the artist and the album.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Change in Structure, Style, and Meaning from Old English to 16th Century: Maybe Love Isn’t So Great?
The first thing that I began notice as I progressed in my readings was the obvious change in structure from the Old English time period to the 16th century. Although they are poems, the literary works we read from Old English are not what one thinks of when one hears the word poem. Poems are usually thought of as rhyming lines with a regular meter or rhythm. Both “The Wanderer” and “The Wife’s Lament” following more of an essay or journal style writing in which the speaker tells of their hardships and sorrows being away from their loved one(s). In the Middle English works, the structure becomes much more apparent. The works of this time period are ballads in which Chaucer includes three or more stanzas written with the same rhyme scheme. Middle English is where we begin to found more structure in the ballads and lyrics, which often help the reader to remember the poem better. As we move to the 16th century, we see Wyatt continue the use of structure. The structures of his poems are Petrarch sonnets but they steam away from the usual rhyme scheme. Also in the 16th century, Howard uses the English sonnet structure in his works. Usually ballads and sonnets are truly representative of love, however, this may not be the case, as I will investigate in the next part of my blog entry.
Not only did I notice the change in structure of the works we read this week, I also noticed a shift in the style and meaning behind the works. Although all the works focused on love as a central focal point, they all have varying views of love. In the beginning of our literary journey, “The Wanderer” shows the devastation of losing a loved one and the need to replace them or move on to a different place in order to heal. Love is portrayed as something that is great when it is there but as the speaker in “The Wanderer” learned the hard way, lost love is the worst thing to have to deal. The speaker’s life seems as though it is a miserable burden day in and day out. The speaker in “The Wife’s Lament” also feels as though lost love is unbearable. The speaker points out that this the only she can think of and has faith that her loved is going through the same despair.
In the Middle English time period Chaucer writes about the frustration one can feel while in the state of being in love. In Chaucer’s “Troilus’s Song”, the speaker makes comments that allude to love as something that you can never get enough of, “For always thurste I, the more that I drinke” (Chaucer 316). In “Alison”, also written during the Middle English time period, the speaker claims, “I am for wooing worn out from waking” (437). Both these lines imply that love is some exhausting and frustrating on top of being great.
In the 16th century, we come to read sonnets by Wyatt. Sonnets are normally thought of a love poem, something written about love and how great it is. However, Wyatt did not necessarily stick with this rule of thumb. Wyatt seems to have this negative view towards women, which shows up in sonnets. In the modern prose translation of “I Find No Peace”, the sonnet ends with “Equally displeasing to me are death and life. In this state am I, Lady, on account of you” (Wyatt 597). Here Wyatt is basically blaming his misery on the woman who he used to be in love with. Wyatt does not make love out to seem so great in this sonnet. Also during this time period, Howard wrote sonnets, which were said to be concerned with the structure than the actual inspiration of the poem. It seems, as though both writers of this time were writing sonnets, which typically are very lovey-dovey, that were not focused on the benefits of love.
All this being said, these "love" poems left me thinking, is love that great? (especially when it ends)



